As educators implement new science standards in their classrooms, one of the most important decisions they face is selecting the best instructional materials to support student learning. Achieve has worked with teachers, states, and leaders in science education research to develop a suite of tools to support educators in this effort.
Is this resource designed for the NGSS? The EQuIP tools can help you answer this question.
The Educators Evaluating the Quality of Instructional Products (EQuIP) suite of tools includes rubrics to evaluate science lessons, units, and year-long instructional materials, a professional learning facilitator's guide, and some quality example lessons vetted by the Peer Review Panel for Science. These tools can help educators make evidence-based decisions about which instructional materials to use and help developers/publishers determine how to design materials for the NGSS to ensure that their final product is true to the standards.
Evaluating Instructional Materials
EQuIP Rubric for Science: The Educators Evaluating the Quality of Instructional Products (EQuIP) Rubric for science provides criteria by which to measure the degree to which lessons and units are designed for the NGSS. The EQuIP webpage includes information for the EQuIP rubric, a professional learning facilitators guide, helpful training videos, and more.
NGSS Lesson Screener: The NGSS Lesson Screener provides criteria for a quick look into the degree to which lessons and units are designed for the NGSS.
PEEC: "PEEC" is an acronym for the Primary Evaluation of Essential Criteria for NGSS Instructional Materials Design. PEEC can be used by educators to evaluate the NGSS design of t comprehensive science instructional materials programs, including different units, kits, modules, textbooks, textbook series, or web-based instructional materials.
Peer Review Panel: The EQuIP Peer Review Panel (PRP) for Science was launched in September 2016 to provide concrete examples of high quality lessons and units that, along with professional learning, can support implementation of the NGSS. The PRP seeks to identify lessons and units that best illustrate the cognitive demands of the NGSS as introduced in A Framework for K-12 Science Education. To submit lessons or units to the PRP for review, click here.
Quality Examples of Instructional Materials: The criterion-based reviews provided by the Peer Review Panel are meant to be constructive and in the spirit of continuous improvement. All submissions receive feedback regardless of their rating and confidentiality will be ensured for those that are not ready to be shared publicly. Lessons and units that are rated by the PRP as Examples of High Quality NGSS Design, Examples of High Quality NGSS Design, If Improved, or identified as Quality Works in Progress will be publicly posted along with the EQuIP criterion-based feedback so that all educators can benefit from these materials.